Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A75-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120813
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateApr 26 '21 at 14:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 84.6
36% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 149
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4.5
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 89 84 87 89 92 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 195
Write 136
Mixed 163
SusWrite 89.7
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 23.5
79% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 95.7
85% 128 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 80%
HPT DISK 0_0 12TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 80 81 84 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX OCZ3G1333LV2G KHX1600C9D3/4GX OCZ3G1333LV2G 12GB
1333, 1066, 1333, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M PRO Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback