Today's hottest deals

Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A75M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 89.8
46% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 178
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 6
6% 7.4 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.5
6% 7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 392 386 397 386 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 449
Write 399
Mixed 384
SusWrite 382
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 33.7
110% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 228
176% 241 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 4.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.7
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.1
134% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback