Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LK R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 47%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 74.2
38% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 138
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.881.0.0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 4.9
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
505GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 64 59 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 103
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 66
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback