Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20138

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20138  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 19:01
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 137
58% 96 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 345
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3901) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.3b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 127 129 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 324
Write 131
Mixed 177
SusWrite 130
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 27.9
101% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 80.1
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 106
80% 106 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 99U5428-065.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO159E
Typical 20138 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback