Today's hottest deals

Compaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCompaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON NARRA5
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 14 '20 at 01:07
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 805
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 74.5
42% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 146
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Dell(1028 0B0E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 7.5
7% 8.73 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 25 9.8 29 52 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 73.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 34.6
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
27GB free
Firmware: JF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 59 60 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 62.8
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 59.4
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HDT725040VLA 400GB
49GB free
Firmware: V5CO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 48
Write 47
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 35.1
29% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24%
Great: 35%
Jmicron Generic 80GB
34GB free
Firmware: 9201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 22.1
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 15.2
15% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 32%
Jmicron Generic 160GB
47GB free
Firmware: 9201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 22.3
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 15.1
15% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback