Today's hottest deals

Livefan LIVEFAN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLivefan LIVEFAN  (all builds)
MotherboardINET P313R
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '18 at 20:11
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 42.6
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 85.4
34% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 168
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4982
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 2.22
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 5.91
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Generic 80GB
59GB free
Firmware: 8101
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 54.9
Write 55.5
Mixed 48.3
40% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.37
75% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Sandisk SEM64G 63GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 120
Write 40.6
Mixed 54.6
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 2.22
554% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIVEFAN Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Livefan LIVEFAN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback