Today's hottest deals

Biostar B350ET2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar B350ET2  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '18 at 08:59
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 699
68% 558 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 36.9
32% 35.2 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 35.3
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 468
Write 314
Mixed 326
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 3.92
69% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20.4
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 3.79
26% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 99%
WD WD1602ABYS-19B7A0 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 102
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.32
105% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Jmicron Generic 160GB
30GB free
Firmware: 9201
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 67
Write 65.3
Mixed 64.6
50% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.29
78% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
I-O DATA HDEL-UT 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0160
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 112
Write 120
Mixed 91.2
138% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.27
87% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$37
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350ET2 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar B350ET2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback