Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCEA36FK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony VPCEA36FK  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 07:53
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 67
33% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 145
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Sony(104D 9071) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 0.3
0% 1.9 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3
Splatting 4.5
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GS 320GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 42 36 42 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 60.3
Write 54.8
Mixed 28
SusWrite 40.4
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEA36FK Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Sony VPCEA36FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback