Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory22 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User MAC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.40GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 142
57% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 420
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 27.3
28% 27.9 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 33
25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 256GB-$37
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 471
Write 416
Mixed 432
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 11.7
65% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 41.2
DQ Mixed 11.6
14% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2L16BC8R2-B0BS 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.8% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 24.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback