Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '18 at 09:27
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.40GHz
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 63
2-Core 155
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 514
49% 407 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2768) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 25.9
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 11.5TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 1,048
Write 532
Mixed 619
161% 733 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 1.71
43% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 24.1
DQ Mixed 5.22
20% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 240GB-$600
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.50 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 389
Write 199
Mixed 206
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 12.3
66% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 63.7
85% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 31.2
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback