Today's hottest deals

HP Z240 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP Z240 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802E
Memory43.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 20:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 195
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 585
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 25.1
24% 27.3 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 25
22% 26.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 629 628 640 637 638 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,808
Write 1,551
Mixed 904
SusWrite 660
274% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 56.8
191% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 761
558% 736 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 204%
Great: 259%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
908GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 173 178 178 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 160
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 175
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-011.A00G 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.6% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback