Today's hottest deals

Wipro WSG64755W7-0007

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWipro WSG64755W7-0007  (all builds)
MotherboardDIGILITE DL-880GMLE-FX
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '18 at 06:57
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 975
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 101
52% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 209
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
ASRock(1849 9715) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.902.0.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.84 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.35
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 33.3
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.34
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
37GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 82.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 16.6
38% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.29
82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate USB 750GB
11GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 23.7
Mixed 25
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.19
54% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2U139C4P2-B05S 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback