PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110309 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 22 '21 at 20:25 |
Run Duration | 217 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 70% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 975
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 49 46 70 54 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45% | 20% | 107 | 323 | 254 | 60 | 28.8" | 2560 1080 | GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 21x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 7x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $172 |