Today's hottest deals

HP 240 G1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 240 G1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1854
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 06:50
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 55.9
40% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 115
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.91
4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 80 96 88 92 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 254
Write 151
Mixed 182
SusWrite 89.8
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 111
86% 116 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate USB 750GB
575GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 8.9 9.3 8.8 6.8 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Read 8
Write 8.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 8.1
11% 7.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback