Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop E410MAB_E410MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop E410MAB_E410MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E410MAB
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 15:52
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Memory 26.6
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 78.2
28% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 85.6
8-Core 95.1
12% 90.3 Pts
64-Core 94.3
6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1DC2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 2
2% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee P900F128GH 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7.7H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 141 128 132 123 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 506
Write 316
Mixed 330
SusWrite 138
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 17.5
91% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 61.5
76% 134 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 133%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GN 256GB
95GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 278 247 294 278 296 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
Read 58.6
Write 310
Mixed 202
SusWrite 278
49% 212 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 21.2
67% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 95
DQ Mixed 104
78% 104 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron_ 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 275
14% 275 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop E410MAB_E410MA Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop E410MAB_E410MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback