Today's hottest deals

Juana SF20GM7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJuana SF20GM7  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Mobile PC
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 19:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 44.6
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 94.9
38% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 77.2
8-Core 78.7
10% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 79.8
5% 79.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S3SSDA256-ECS-1 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210324a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 132 188 191 191 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 294
Write 293
Mixed 287
SusWrite 194
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 25
82% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 138
104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO440D85-2666E 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SF20GM7 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Juana SF20GM7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback