Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DAP
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 22:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 52
2-Core 86.4
40% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 118
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1072) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.3
1% 2.63 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee P900F128GH 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7.11H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 415 519 403 142 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 216
Write 425
Mixed 247
SusWrite 344
70% 308 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 11.4
32% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 44.8
DQ Mixed 62.9
56% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 12GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback