Today's hottest deals

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory1.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 15:33
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 187
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 487
51% 410 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 311.66
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 3.7
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 3.7 20 251 5.3 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 341
Write 268
Mixed 250
SusWrite 73.4
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 11.1
68% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 93.1
DQ Mixed 14.9
24% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
149GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 100 114 115 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 112
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 76%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 31.8
Write 26.8
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 19.2
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
110GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 26.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 19.3
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 18.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback