Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 19:13
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 69
2-Core 133
58% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 406
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 74.9
50% 65.2 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 51.4
47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KF128G8L 128GB
20GB free
Firmware: LHFL05N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 132 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 444
Write 191
Mixed 235
SusWrite 132
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 36.9
132% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 146
120% 172 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 34 95 115 121 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 125
Write 127
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 94.6
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$55
233GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 83.9
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 89.8
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback