Today's hottest deals

CDM CS-B/CDM/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCDM CS-B/CDM/SI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CS-B/CDM/SI
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 08:14
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 562
62% 487 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 417 418 409 404 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 418
Write 378
Mixed 326
SusWrite 412
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 19.3
115% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 31.6
73% 150 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 313%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: A50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 133 132 135 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 134
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVT8FP-HYC 1311 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CS-B/CDM/SI Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: CDM CS-B/CDM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback