Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer LY310
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 03:27
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 89%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 127
2-Core 224
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 437
48% 376 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 69.1
61% 72.5 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 68.2
57% 70.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1621 1387 1414 1292 1349 1258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,404
Write 1,100
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 1,387
278% 1,234 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 68.8
238% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1065
DQ Write 727
DQ Mixed 781
614% 858 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 254%
Great: 390%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 105 100 94 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 95.7
Write 90.7
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 99.3
117% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 62%
External USB3.0 250GB
40GB free, PID 0578
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 24 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 32.6
Write 26.8
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 24.3
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 11.8
883% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.9
1,093% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 109%
External USB3.0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Read 24
Write 19.3
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 2.9
21% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 49%
External USB3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.6 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 23.6
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 3.5
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 118%
External USB3.0 4TB
229GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.6 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 24.5
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 0.6
23% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 20.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback