Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82BH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82BH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 20:16
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 312
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 710
78% 616 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 28
21% 26.8 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 16.5
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 14.1
14% 17 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 15.8
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 982 447 366 364 361 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,160
Write 987
Mixed 930
SusWrite 579
205% 914 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 46.4
155% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 870
583% 716 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 158%
Great: 222%
Sobetter Ext 1TB
775GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 373 365 371 372 373 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 332
Write 314
Mixed 261
SusWrite 370
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 28.4
93% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 116
87% 116 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 77%
External USB3.0 500GB
168GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.8
Write 24.7
Mixed 24.5
33% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 176%
External USB3.0 500GB
466GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 13 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 24.3
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 15.5
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 176%
External USB3.0 250GB
233GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 13 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 25.1
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 15.6
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 28.3
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 19
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82BH Builds (Compare 1,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82BH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback