Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829A
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 16:34
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 99.9
49% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 207
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 829A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.03 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.6
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4800105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 300 369 279 288 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 214
Write 226
Mixed 212
SusWrite 300
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 9.3
35% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 128
100% 138 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 128%
Intel MEMPEK1J016GA 14GB
12GB free
Firmware: K4110400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 131 149 129 134 135 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 382
Write 110
Mixed 192
SusWrite 133
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 25.5
107% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 176
162% 257 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 246%
External USB3.0 250GB
92GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 51.6
Write 18.7
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 25.9
35% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 109%
External USB3.0 500GB
264GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 15 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Read 24.1
Write 31.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 14
31% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
4% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-UH HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 483
8% 483 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback