Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G5 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G5 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8596
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201016
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 23:23
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,134
101% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8596) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 9
5% 8.33 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.7
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SWORDFISH 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 879 950 922 946 930 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,778
Write 842
Mixed 795
SusWrite 927
241% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 47.9
173% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 458
330% 411 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 198%
Great: 227%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$100
921GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1830 1647 1655 1644 1658 1702 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,825
Mixed 1356
SusWrite 1,689
386% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 78.9
282% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,676
DQ Write 1,308
DQ Mixed 1,492
1,116% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 336%
Great: 347%
SanDisk Ultra 250GB
184GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 19.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 22.4
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2
139% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 38%
External USB3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.6 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23% Poor
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 62
SusWrite 11.9
92% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23%
Great: 118%
External USB3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.5 0.3 1.5 1 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 90.8
Write 134
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 3.3
97% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 85%
External USB3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 145 147 148 147 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.8% Good
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 146
184% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
External USB3.0 1TB
719GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 147 148 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 311
Write 313
Mixed 266
SusWrite 145
343% 259 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 20.7
1,648% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 20.6
1,651% 22 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 160%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 27.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G5 MT Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G5 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback