Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 22:10
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 71.1
43% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 67.2
8-Core 75.9
9% 71.6 Pts
64-Core 70.1
4% 70.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2.3
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.4
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 61 61 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 83.8
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 68%
ST980815 A 80GB
36GB free, PID 0272
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 21 25 30 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 30
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 26.7
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Ultra 250GB
228GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 12 14 16 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 17.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 15
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
105% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
U 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback