Today's hottest deals

HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AE
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181214
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 39.8
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 119
42% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 180
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84AE) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.40.50
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 414
Write 371
Mixed 349
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 30.8
94% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 149
112% 150 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
Maxone USB 3.0 320GB
169GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 22.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 27.2
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback