Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cm0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A2
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 22:44
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 175
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 254
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84A2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 6.9
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.4
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 33 73 50 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 120
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 50.9
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-cm0xxx Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback