Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH317-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienna_CFS
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime54.6 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 138
59% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 382
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1266) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6195
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 6.6
0% 13.7 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 111 111 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 415
Write 245
Mixed 222
SusWrite 112
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 34.3
130% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 205
162% 228 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
931GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 113 113 113 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 35
SusWrite 110
66% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-52 Builds (Compare 1,608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback