Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 13:30
Run Duration460 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$330
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,065
100% 828 Pts
64-Core 2,127
132% 2,127 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 150
Reflection 149
Parallax 149
123% 149 fps
Gravity 132
Splatting 116
109% 124 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 847 863 1075 1069 805 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,505
Write 1,087
Mixed 1,029
SusWrite 953
308% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 13.3
119% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 84.3
DQ Mixed 18.7
147% 370 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 216%
Great: 429%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
192GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1748 1772 1173 1102 1170 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2246
Write 1,536
Mixed 1,836
SusWrite 1,190
381% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 7.3
123% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 15.2
150% 383 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 221%
Great: 390%
External USB3.0 2TB
989GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.8 1 0.9 0.8 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 150
Write 168
Mixed 145
SusWrite 1.1
151% 116 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
51% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 118%
WD My Passport 259D 3TB
2TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 48 45 58 57 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 73.9
Write 61.7
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 51.1
76% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.9
241% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 42%
External USB3.0 2TB
913GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1 0.9 0.6 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 150
Write 190
Mixed 163
SusWrite 0.7
167% 126 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 118%
External USB3.0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
Read 97.4
Write 122
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 1.1
97% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 2.13 MB/s
External USB3.0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 114 115 138 141 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 177
Write 173
Mixed 118
SusWrite 126
197% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 85%
External USB3.0 1TB
422GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 113 115 138 140 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 371
Mixed 361
SusWrite 126
411% 314 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 26.8
1,982% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 35.7
1,507% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 179%
Great: 198%
External USB3.0 1TB
756GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 49 44 57 60 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
Read 47
Write 52
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 49.4
67% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.3
137% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 40%
External USB3.0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 126 125 155 147 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
Read 142
Write 157
Mixed 147
SusWrite 136
200% 146 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
225% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 1TB
429GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 48 44 57 60 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.5% Poor
Read 86.4
Write 105
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 49.5
114% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.9 MB/s
External USB3.0 8TB
7.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 118 109 106 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63% Good
Read 173
Write 164
Mixed 105
SusWrite 133
190% 144 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
157% 7.3 MB/s
External USB3.0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 91 82 79 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
Read 104
Write 128
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 99.8
141% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 1.07 MB/s
External USB3.0 6TB
5.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 119 109 106 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.1% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 253
Mixed 136
SusWrite 133
251% 192 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.7
373% 4.63 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 7.6
DQ Mixed 2.1
334% 3.6 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 23.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback