Today's hottest deals

Samsung 530U4E/540U4E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 42% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 530U4E/540U4E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT530U4E-S65R
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime4 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 12:28
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 46.1
1-Core 22
2-Core 35.1
24% 34.4 Pts
4-Core 53.9
8-Core 55.4
7% 54.7 Pts
64-Core 55.9
4% 55.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0E8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 2.7
3% 5.2 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk i100 24GB
22GB free
Firmware: 11.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 81 57 67 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 343
Write 85.3
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 71.2
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 6.7
29% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 31%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 287 290 286 293 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 433
Write 290
Mixed 268
SusWrite 289
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 21.7
74% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 131
99% 132 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U4E/540U4E Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U4E/540U4E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback