Today's hottest deals

Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP530U4C-S05IN
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130419
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 86.8
48% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 126
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk i100 24GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 64 62 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 343
Write 85.3
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 59.3
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 2.7
20% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 31%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
286GB free
Firmware: 0004LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 87
Write 97.2
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 96.1
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 13.2" 1280 720 SEC0200
Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback