Today's hottest deals

Samsung 770Z7E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 770Z7E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP770Z7E-S01PT
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '16 at 18:27
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3635QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 433
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0EC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.45 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.43
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 87.7
Write 68.3
Mixed 62.2
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.07
4K Mixed 0.07
12% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Slice 64GB
7GB free, PID 5566
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 3.89
Mixed 8.04
10% 9.56 MB/s
4K Read 3.44
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.93
88% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 770Z7E Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 770Z7E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback