Today's hottest deals

Samsung 770Z7E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 770Z7E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP770Z7E-S01PL
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 00:22
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3635QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 61.6
36% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 97.1
8-Core 207
18% 152 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0EC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 1.7
2% 6.43 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 198 41 27 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 412
Write 214
Mixed 231
SusWrite 110
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 18.1
60% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 311
186% 194 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 770Z7E Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 770Z7E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback