Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion ERAZER X5397 F/C160

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Medion ERAZER X5397 F/C160 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151120
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	May 14 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$160 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 84.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 226 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 654 70% 558 Pts	64-Core 653 40% 653 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3203) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 43 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 38 35% 41.3 fps	MRender 39.9 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 34.5 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4304 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 490 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 61 (AE) Unknown 99 99 144 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 790 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 53 40 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 16265509 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7620 (F2) Unknown 99 99 3349 (F9) Unknown 99 99 15616	82.3% Excellent	Read 508 Write 166 Mixed 279 69% 317 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 33.5 135% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 103 114% 198 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 100%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 756GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 181 5791 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2013 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3068 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 489 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 59 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13419 (C2) HDA temperature 120 113 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.7% Above average	Read 106 Write 80.5 Mixed 96.7 71% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.29 101% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 83%
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 34.7 Mixed 21.5 38% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.2 72% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 32%
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B1 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 784GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.9% Very poor	Read 34.7 Write 32.6 Mixed 15.9 34% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.17 70% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 18%
Generic- Multi-Card 64GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 60GB free, PID 0157 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.98% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 11.1 Mixed 9.52 15% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.86 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.007 11% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.98% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	75% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 23.6 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5397 F/C160 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Medion ERAZER X5397 F/C160

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $160Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $358

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350