Today's hottest deals

Medion Erazer X5383 E/B497

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer X5383 E/B497  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 29 '16 at 13:15
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 682
72% 574 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 58
50% 61.7 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 57.1
Splatting 52.4
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 499
Write 319
Mixed 383
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 31.4
116% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 17.2
27% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 97%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 124
Mixed 130
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.19
101% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 84%
Generic- Multi-Card 64GB
14GB free, PID 0157
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 11.9
Mixed 9.65
17% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.03
21% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18.3
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X5383 E/B497 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Medion Erazer X5383 E/B497

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $573
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback