Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M1800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M1800  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MMCP73VEM
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090801
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 18:59
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$40
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 42
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 55.6
27% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 60.9
8% 59.5 Pts
64-Core 61.1
4% 61.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.66 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 53 29 37 77 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 90.7
Write 76.9
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 51.3
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
170% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8
0GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 4.6 3.4 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 1
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.4
7% 6.83 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 9%
WDC WD20 EARX-008FB0 2TB
69GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.1 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 19.4
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 4.1
21% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 36%
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB
538GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.1 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 22.2
Mixed 19
SusWrite 2.8
21% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 32%
WDC WD15 EARS-00J2GB0 1.5TB
3GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 15 18 16 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.03% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 21.7
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 16.1
23% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
15% 0.27 MB/s
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
146GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.23% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 19.9
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 0.2
20% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.5% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1800 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M1800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback