Today's hottest deals

HP Elite 7300 Series MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Elite 7300 Series MT  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory14.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120105
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 21:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 427
46% 365 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.2
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 228 231 224 226 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.5% Good
Read 249
Write 231
Mixed 229
SusWrite 227
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 33.8
111% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 186
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G4D1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 14.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite 7300 Series MT Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite 7300 Series MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback