Today's hottest deals

Foxconn MCP61M05

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFoxconn MCP61M05  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN M61PMV
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 13:38
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Processor model unknown
AMD Processor model unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 105
49% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 104
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.11 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.96
2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 21 53 46 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 49.3
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 41.9
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 58%
Excelsto r Technology 250GB
45GB free
Firmware: GM2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 80 81 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 31.2
Write 55.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 81.7
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP61M05 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn MCP61M05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback