Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compaq-presario GJ320AA-ABM SG2100LA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario GJ320AA-ABM SG2100LA (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Iris
Memory	2.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20070503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '16 at 02:42
Run Duration	302 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ 5,400 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 60.2 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 80.6 38% 60.2 Pts	4-Core 79.5 8-Core 79.8 11% 79.7 Pts	64-Core 79.4 5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 1529) 2GB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.81 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 1.74 2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Excelsto r Technology 250GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: GM2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 84.6 Write 82.2 Mixed 82.1 62% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.31 90% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 33 Write 5.24 Mixed 6.12 13% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.82 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.8 85% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback