Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 9625A72

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 9625A72  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 02:02
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 555
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 47
2-Core 91.7
47% 72 Pts
4-Core 91.9
8-Core 89
12% 90.4 Pts
64-Core 90.7
6% 90.7 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics
Legend(17AA 303F) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.64 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 78 115 94 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 95.9
69% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 88%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4 3.7 4.1 3.6 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.7
6% 5.45 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback