Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Q370M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Q370M-C  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 00:45
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 238
90% 157 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1109
99% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 24.1
20% 23.1 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 19.3
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 743 693 655 761 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,047
Write 710
Mixed 496
SusWrite 633
161% 722 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 14.7
103% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 96.9
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 41
98% 192 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 122%
Great: 237%
WD Blue 1TB-$108
203GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 250 238 267 285 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 367
Mixed 295
SusWrite 269
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 42.1
148% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 225
191% 279 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
544GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 100
Write 98.1
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 71.8
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 84%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 160GB-$34
75GB free
Firmware: GMBOA5BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 66.4
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 67.2
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
396GB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 108 109 110 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 110
Write 98.7
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 108
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 91%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 12.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 11.8
16% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 24
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Q370M-C Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q370M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback