Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq dc5850 MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc5850 MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory0.2 GB free of 1.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 15:13
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 38
2-Core 73.2
40% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 72.6
8-Core 74.8
10% 73.7 Pts
64-Core 75.4
5% 75.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics
HP(103C 3029) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.32% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.55 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.32%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$49
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 16 17 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 11.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 15.2
7% 10 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 34GB
null MHz
1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.96% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 0.2
5% 1.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 0
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.96%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5850 MT PC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Compaq dc5850 MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback