Today's hottest deals

Intel DG31PR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL DG31PR
MotherboardIntel DG31PR  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 x 65536 colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '17 at 22:19
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$54
J3E1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 54.1
36% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 67.5
8-Core 75.6
9% 71.6 Pts
64-Core 80.4
5% 80.4 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP0822N 80GB
71GB free
Firmware: WA100-33 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 53.4
Mixed 22.6
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.34
78% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 30%
Seagate ST3120827AS 120GB-$38
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 41.3
Mixed 25.5
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.33
64% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
14GB free
Firmware: 3.ADJ Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 65.6
Mixed 25.4
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.44
106% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DG31PR Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DG31PR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $288WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback