Today's hottest deals

Pcchips P65G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcchips P65G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCCHIPS P65G
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111018
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 08:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 140
58% 97 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 150
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 42
26% 35.4 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 33.6
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3120827AS 120GB-$38
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 14 16 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 41.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 23.3
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 32%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
169GB free
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 35 33 54 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 26
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 43.2
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 99U5474-015.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65G Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Pcchips P65G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback