Today's hottest deals

Megaware AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMegaware AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 8I865GME-775
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060831
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 21:50
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 52.5
1-Core 23
2-Core 32.6
26% 36 Pts
4-Core 44.1
8-Core 45.6
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 45.9
3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP0822N 80GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WA100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 6.4 6.6 7.8 17 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 3.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 12.2
7% 9.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.25% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $288WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback