Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-7350

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMSI MS-7350  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070131
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 20:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 17.1
29% 35 Pts
4-Core 46
8-Core 45.3
6% 45.7 Pts
64-Core 32.6
2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4650
XFX(1682 2451) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
3% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 5.4
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 58 22 8.1 11 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 64.2
Write 64.1
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 27.5
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.56% Terrible
MC Read 0.7
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 0.3
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7350 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback