Today's hottest deals

Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP540U3C-A01PT
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Memory 7.3
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 9.3
5% 7.77 Pts
4-Core 6.7
8-Core 8.3
1% 7.5 Pts
64-Core 1.9
0% 1.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.31 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.48
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2-power SSD2043A 480GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 56 61 81 79 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 354
Write 304
Mixed 259
SusWrite 77.2
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 12.3
44% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 96.6
77% 108 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
244GB free, PID 0202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 57 58 58 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 47.6
Write 59.5
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 58
66% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 430
9% 430 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback