Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard ixtreme M5800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Packard ixtreme M5800 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard ixtreme M5800
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '19 at 09:38
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$60 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 79 2-Core 147 66% 106 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 265 36% 266 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E145) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 2.09 1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB 7,100 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 44.5 Write 32 Mixed 29 SusWrite 37.8 26% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$49 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 63GB free Firmware: 3.CH SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 51 52 53 55 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 47.8 Write 55.7 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 52.7 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 42%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 27.1 Write 22.9 Mixed 24.6 31% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 10GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 19.2 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 12.5 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.4 132% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 46GB free, PID 2322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 21.9 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 22.4 27% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.1 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 52%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 1,630 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 0GB free, PID 2322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 27.5 Write 21.7 Mixed 15.7 26% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 48%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 13GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 20.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 12.8 26% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 533GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 20.4 Write 21.2 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 12.8 26% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.4 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G1600K 802C 4JTF12864AZ-1G4D1 859B RM51264BA1339.16FM 802C 4JTF12864AZ-1G4D1 8GB 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.6% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 12.4 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ixtreme M5800 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5800

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $40Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	34x
Core i7 860Intel $265Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	4x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 330NvidiaBench 5%, 845 samples	7x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	6x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
CS900 480GBPNY $38Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	2x
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 3x2GBUnknownBench 29%, 207 samples	5x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 207 samples	3x
GU512303EP0202 4x2GBUnknownBench 37%, 604 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $65

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350