Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120502
Uptime8 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 521
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 62.5
58% 68.2 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 71.3
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
473GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 123 123 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 122
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 67 72 85 89 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 79.4
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 111 106 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 108
Write 127
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 121
154% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 1TB
144GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 62 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 59.8
Write 27.3
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 58.6
62% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback