Today's hottest deals

Asrock H77M-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H77M-ITX  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 11:49
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 374
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 363 65 42 49 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 426
Write 374
Mixed 348
SusWrite 158
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 21
94% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 23.8
32% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
421GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 72.4
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 64.2
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
912GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 25.5
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 18.2
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 51%
WD Elements 2TB
537GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 24.9
Mixed 23
SusWrite 26.5
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 44%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
670GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 20
32% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
65% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77M-ITX Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback